I'll keep my first post simple:
1. As you have suggested, Charlie/ Kloe Kane is shooting again; requests soon! I wonder if she would consent to inserting some swaying thing, like a ponytail dildo, panties or stockings and then to walk, dance, move, sway and invite us to watch. Seems the key to such distant sensuality is invitation. I suspect you already know that.
2. I don't know why, but women f***ing inanimate objects is a turn-on. Chair leg, bedpost, etc. Yet again, I think the focus is in being invited to watch.
3. The original Michelle: the lost video "Bar Lapdance". She had, in this video, a very special invitation to intimacy with her. I'd really like a vid where she expands on this: just to see all of her and to experience the fact that she is willing to share her body.
It is good to see eroticism is alive and well. It's also good that the models/performers don't seem demeaned by the scenes..however wonderfully filthy!
I think every model on the site has a special quality that has been captured by the WIN team, it's easy to forget that these erotic performers are giving something special of themselves, fortunately WIN hasn't.
I'm sure every female erotic performer knows that a man, at least at some time, is quite interested in seeing anything that is inserted in their pussies. After many years of easily available porn, fake orgasms and disrespectful dildo/masturbation scenes don't do it. When a woman performs erotic acts in stills or film, she is essentially sharing a very personal part of herself and it is this sharing which makes it erotic. There are sites out there, some popular ones, in which unusual circumstances, public display, female masturbation and "wierd" insertions are so sterile and disrespectful as to be a major turn-off, rather than a turn-on. A woman is not meat.
1. As you have suggested, Charlie/ Kloe Kane is shooting again; requests soon! I wonder if she would consent to inserting some swaying thing, like a ponytail dildo, panties or stockings and then to walk, dance, move, sway and invite us to watch. Seems the key to such distant sensuality is invitation. I suspect you already know that.
2. I don't know why, but women f***ing inanimate objects is a turn-on. Chair leg, bedpost, etc. Yet again, I think the focus is in being invited to watch.
3. The original Michelle: the lost video "Bar Lapdance". She had, in this video, a very special invitation to intimacy with her. I'd really like a vid where she expands on this: just to see all of her and to experience the fact that she is willing to share her body.
It is good to see eroticism is alive and well. It's also good that the models/performers don't seem demeaned by the scenes..however wonderfully filthy!
I think every model on the site has a special quality that has been captured by the WIN team, it's easy to forget that these erotic performers are giving something special of themselves, fortunately WIN hasn't.
I'm sure every female erotic performer knows that a man, at least at some time, is quite interested in seeing anything that is inserted in their pussies. After many years of easily available porn, fake orgasms and disrespectful dildo/masturbation scenes don't do it. When a woman performs erotic acts in stills or film, she is essentially sharing a very personal part of herself and it is this sharing which makes it erotic. There are sites out there, some popular ones, in which unusual circumstances, public display, female masturbation and "wierd" insertions are so sterile and disrespectful as to be a major turn-off, rather than a turn-on. A woman is not meat.
